An interface can open before a user supplies an email address and still process device information, session data or submitted text. “No signup,” “private” and “no logging” answer different questions.
The practical task here is deciding what information to include in a fictional companion conversation. This is a reading of provider policies, not legal advice or an independent security assessment.
FreeGF’s broad claim meets a specific retention policy
FreeGF’s homepage uses no-signup and no-logging language. Its privacy policy, dated January 15, 2025, describes stored chat logs and lists a two-year retention period, with legal exceptions. The two statements should not be blended into a reassuring promise.
The same policy describes generated media, account data, technical information and analytics, with different retention rules. It states that generated media is kept for one year after creation or until account deletion, and payment records for seven years. Those are provider statements; this review has not audited their implementation.
A guest entry screen also does not establish guest access to every action. The image-to-video guide says an account is required to generate. Public browsing, initial chat access and paid media therefore need separate descriptions.
Infatuated documents continuity and collection
Infatuated’s FAQ says a conversation can remain remembered after a session closes, but not after the chat is deleted. That supports continuity of the experience; it does not prove deletion from every backup or provider record.
Its privacy policy, last updated September 13, 2024, describes information users submit and technical data collected automatically, including IP and device or usage details. It describes retention according to ongoing purposes and legal needs, rather than a universal fixed chat-expiry date.
The policy’s deletion section includes an account-purge request process and a stated 90-day account-data deletion period in its EEA/GDPR account-purge paragraph. Elsewhere it discusses backups and circumstances where deletion is not immediately possible. It would be misleading to shorten that whole policy to “delete a chat and everything disappears.”
A private gallery is about visibility to other users. It is not proof that the provider and its service processors have no role in storing or handling the media.
Choose the smallest useful fictional record
A creative session needs much less personal information than a diary. For a fictional adult museum guide, this is enough:
| Needed for the creative task | Unnecessary for the task |
|---|---|
| An invented name and adult age | Your legal name or identification |
| An imagined museum and opening scene | Your home or workplace address |
| A speech style and fictional interests | Private details about another person |
| A fictional event date | Financial or medical records |
This keeps the character useful while reducing the consequences of retention, accidental sharing or a compromised account. It does not make the service anonymous.
Do not use a real person’s private information as a shortcut to a “realistic” fictional character. A role, a setting and a distinctive voice can create specificity without that material.
Match cleanup to the intended result
Closing a browser ends the visible session; it does not submit a deletion request. Removing a conversation, removing generated media and requesting account deletion are also distinct actions.
If the purpose is to stop returning to one story, chat cleanup may solve that organizational problem. If the purpose is to request deletion of personal data, use the provider’s policy process and retain the request date and response. Do not include more intimate material in a support request than is necessary to identify the account and records.
Which service has the stronger privacy evidence?
These public sources do not justify an overall security ranking. FreeGF’s specific policy conflicts with its broad no-logging claim. Infatuated’s policy describes collection and purpose-based retention, while its FAQ describes persistence of conversations.
The supported decision is to keep sensitive real information out of either creative workflow and read the policy for the action you actually intend. Ease of entry is a usability property; it is not a deletion guarantee.